MAY, 2005

 

Message From the President

An Update On Licensing

Paul Kurzman, PhD, ACSW

Now that social work licensing is in effect in our state – for LMSWs and LCSWs – it is time for an update.

 
In collaboration with the leadership of the NYS Chapter of NASW, we here at the NYC Chapter, are working very hard to clarify ambiguities in the law and regulations, and to ensure that implementation in Albany proceeds smoothly. 


As promised, I appointed a Licensing Implementation Task Force which is actively engaged in securing needed clarifications and interpretations of the current statute, monitoring the State Education Department’s implementation of the law and its grandparenting provisions, and preparing to recommend any modifications in the statute they see are needed.  The Task Force is under the exceptionally able leadership of our Chapter’s First Vice-President, Jennifer Crumpley, who herself directs a large mental health program at the Educational Alliance here in New York City.  Members of the Task Force represent a wide range of service delivery systems and fields of practice, and I hope you will feel free to share your observations and suggestions with them by e-mail to our Executive Director [schachter@naswnyc.org] at any time.


Grandparenting Provisions
There are several updates that I want to provide but perhaps none is as important as a reminder that there are only a few months left, for those who are eligible to be grandparented (as a LMSW or a LCSW), to apply.  Unless the State Legislature decides to extend this one-time window of opportunity, eligibility to achieve licensure through grandparenting will expire on September 1, 2005.  Previous issues of Currents outlined these opportunities in some detail, and one can go to the Chapter’s website [www.naswnyc.org] or to the NYS Education Department’s website [www.op.nysed.gov] for a refresher.


Mental Health Practitioners
As we have previously reported, an omnibus Mental Health Practitioners’ statute also was enacted in 2002; it will license marriage & family therapists, mental health counselors, creative arts therapists and psychoanalysts. 


Chapter members, who also have credentials in one of these four disciplines, have asked whether it would be advantageous for them to apply for and secure one of these additional licenses.  While for some social workers this may be an option, those of our colleagues who are planning to do so should consider the dilemmas which dual licensure may pose.  In addition to paying a second licensure application fee (and $155 every 3 years for licensure renewal), there may be a problem, for clients and insurance companies, regarding under which license one is actually practicing with a particular client on a given day. This would make a difference.


As we have previously observed, for example, persons practicing under licensure in one of the four newly recognized mental health professions noted above, are prohibited from providing mental health care on a continuous basis to any client who has a diagnosis of a “serious mental illness” (including major depression, ADHD, panic disorder, OCD, and bipolar disorder) without first securing a medical evaluation and consultation from a physician.


In addition, unlike the specific laws that apply to our profession, there currently is no law in NY State mandating third-party payment by insurance carriers to practitioners providing clinical care under any of these four new licenses.  Similarly, providers practicing under these mental health licenses (and their clients) will not enjoy the guarantee of confidentiality (called “Privileged Communication”) that all persons practicing as LMSWs and LCSWs currently have under Section 4508 of NY State Civil Practice Law and Rules –  which may place such practitioners’ relationships at risk in a world where privacy is increasingly difficult to ensure. 


Finally, social workers who secure a mental health license would need to contact the current provider of their professional liability insurance to see if practice under the aegis of this new license would (or would not) be covered by their current social work insurance policy and premium.  In sum, for those social workers who may be eligible, pursuing a second license as a mental health practitioner perhaps should be approached with caution.


Continuing Education
While NASW supported the proposition that continuing education be a mandate for triennial license renewal, the Legislature did not support this proposal.  Given feedback over the past few years from our membership, we realize that there are reasonable arguments on both sides with respect to this issue.  On the one hand, any provision that encourages social workers to keep up-to-date in the ever changing environment in which we practice seems like a very good idea. And presently, we are one of only four states in the country that do not have a continuing education requirement for licensed social workers. 


However, there is little evidence-based research to show that mandated continuing education makes a difference with respect to practice outcomes; and presently, social workers already incur so many costs to maintain their essential professional credentials (e.g., licensure application, ASWB exam fees, triennial registration, liability insurance, and NASW membership, etc.) that the imposition of additional costs may understandably be perceived by some as a burden.


BSW Licensure
As we all know, under our new licensing law [Chapter 420 of the Laws of 2002], the Legislature did not include a third tier of licensure for social workers holding BSW degrees.  However, there may be a window of opportunity for experienced BSWs to qualify for licensure as Mental Health Practitioners under the generous grandparenting provisions of the mental health practitioners’ statute noted above. 


Until January 1, 2006, some BSWs with experience may qualify under Part 79 of the Commissioner’s Regulations for Mental Health Practitioners, which implemented the law [Chapter 676 of the Laws of 2002].  While this is a modest, one-time provision, it might be useful for BSWs and BSW program directors to explore this prospective licensure opportunity.


Child Abuse Training
As we have noted in previous issues of Currents, unless exempted, all licensed social workers are now required by Education Law [Section 6507(3)(a)] – either, upon application for, or, the triennial renewal of their license – to show evidence of having attended an approved two-hour seminar on child abuse and neglect.  Given that there are more than 50,000 social work licensees, many of whom will have a need to get such a certificate of participation, we at NASW–NYC have finalized an agreement with the NYS Nurses Association (which has developed friendly web-based training) so that our members can satisfy this requirement conveniently, online, at a nominal cost, thereby obviating their need to take time out of their busy day to travel to an approved training location.  Information is now available on our website [www.naswnyc.org], providing an icon that offers easy access to the training site for simple, one-stop completion of this requirement.


And Jennifer Crumpley and her Licensing Implementation Task Force will continue to pursue any item you bring to their attention to make certain that the new licensing law serves us well, and, serves the best interests of our clients.  We do live in exciting times!

Back to Home Page