A Taxing Solution Can End Our Budget Crisis

By Bonnie Brower

Bonnie Brower is executive director of City Project, a budget watchdog group in New York City . This article has been excerpted and edited and originally appeared in Newsday on April 18, 2003 .

New Yorkers have had time to react with shock and awe at the litany of first-round and contingency cuts to vital public services and the loss of thousands of jobs contained in Mayor Michael Bloomberg's worse and worst versions of the city's budget.

From firehouses to zoos, from health clinics to foster care, these are just some of the life-altering service losses, along with almost 5,000 job cuts, the mayor intends to make under his "better" budget plan. Other than "suicide by budget," there are no adequate words for the total devastation to the city and its residents that would result from the mayor's

Contingency budget, which contains an additional $1 billion in unspeakably bloody cuts.

Unfortunately, the mayor's "better budget," with its $600 million in cuts, remains heavily dependent on Albany for action. Despite the fact that New York City annually sends at least $3.5 billion more in revenue to Albany

 than it gets back in aid, the state treats the city as a distant family relation.

So isn't there a better way to close the city's $3.8-billion budget hole without depending on the kindness of Albany ?

The answer, put forth by a new and growing citywide coalition of community and civic organizations, faith-based institutions and unions (with the awkward name of the Budget for a Livable NYC Coalition), is a resounding "yes!"

If enacted, the coalition's package would generate $3.5 billion in new city revenues and spread the pain and burdens of our fiscal crisis far more evenly and fairly. The major difference between its approach and the city's is that the coalition recognizes the need for New York City to rely primarily on itself to balance its budget.  

The majority of the proposals focus on making moderate increases to city taxes. First, it's where the money is – right here in the pockets of wealthy city residents and profitable city businesses, who are best able to contribute their fair share to the city's recovery. Second, as city revenues, the new funds will be better protected against theft by the state. Third, Albany is far more likely to allow the city to increase its taxes on residents and businesses than to give us a greater share of state-raised revenues.

Below are several of the Coalitions revenue recommendations:

1.The city should enact a 1-percentage point personal income tax increase for city residents with adjusted incomes of over $250,000. This would raise $595 million from those who can best afford it.

2. We must revise local business taxes, to make the city's business community shoulder a fairer portion of our fiscal burden. The city's three business taxes, all enacted in 1966, have undergone only minor revisions since then. They are sorely outmoded and inequitable, as witnessed by the fact that together they contribute only about 12 percent of city revenues, a share that has remained essentially flat over the past 25 years, during boom and bust times.

The coalition's three business-tax reform proposals collectively would generate $1.19 billion for the city, and ensure that the most profitable businesses contribute a greater share of revenues.

The most lucrative and necessary change would be to make a certain class of businesses, including the wealthiest and most powerful in the city, such as Bloomberg LP, large law firms, and major financial services companies, pay the same tax rate as all city corporations. That would generate $880 million a year on an ongoing basis.

Another example is the ridiculously low $300 minimum general corporate tax, which is paid by over half the city's 240,000 plus corporations, would be increased to $1,000, By comparison, a family of four struggling to survive in New York City on $30,000 now pays the city nearly twice the current minimum corporate tax in personal income taxes 

3. The package also contains a simple 1 percent commuter tax, which would generate $950 million in revenue.

If passed by Albany (which, unfortunately, alone has the power to enact them), these measures would broaden the city's tax base, increase long-term, revenues to maintain vital city services and spread the tax burdens to those best able to shoulder them. Not a bad way to turn a huge fiscal crisis around and create a better funded, more livable and compassionate city.  

This article originally appeared in Newsday.  Visit Newsday online at http://www.newsday.com